Back from the Brink – Aurelian by Joseph Kleinman
Most of us who have a knowledge of ancient history hold to
the concept of divisions. That is to say that we believe that historical
events fall within definite epochs. For example, when considering the history
of the Roman Empire we tend to believe that the Western Empire fell in the
fifth century followed by the “Dark Ages” and that the Eastern Empire
continued on until the mid fifteenth century when it was conquered by The
Turks.
I hold to a different concept.
Most historians would agree that the Western Empire didn’t
fall in the same sense that the Soviet Union did but that it was broken up
after a long period of corruption and decay. That the fall was not an event
taking place at a point in time, but a breakup as the result of a process. The
breakup that we shall look at in this opus didn’t occur in the fifth century
but in the third.
The mid third century was a time of deep crisis for the
Roman Empire. The emperors were concerned mainly with maintaining the loyalty
of the armies whom they had to placate with ever larger donatives which put a
tremendous burden on the already overtaxed citizens. At the same time, the
frontiers were constantly being threatened by barbarian tribes who were
steadily gaining strength as the empire became ever weaker. On or around AD
260 the empire faced a double threat. While the armies were contending with
the German tribes on the Rhine / Danube frontier, the Persians attacked. This
was during the joint reign of Valerian and his son Gallienus. Both emperors
took the field and led their armies against Rome’s enemies. It was Valerian
that went east to meet the Persians. After some initial success the army of
Valerian was trapped and the emperor captured alive and later killed. This
event sent shockwaves throughout the entire Roman world. Very soon after that,
provinces began to break away in order to form separate states that might
better provide for their own defense. Spain was lost, Britain and Gaul were
lost and in the East, Egypt and Syria were controlled by Queen Zenobia of
Palmyra who intended to carve out an empire of her own. Without the resources
of the lost provinces and with a greatly reduced territory from which to
recruit troops for the legions, the empire was doomed.
Although Gallienus was successful in repelling further
barbarian invasions into Roman territory, try as he might, he could not
recover the lost provinces. In AD 268 he was assassinated by a group of
officers one of whom was the future emperor, Aurelian. In AD 270 Aurelian
became emperor and began the campaigns that would restore the Roman world to a
condition resembling its former greatness. One after another the barbarian
tribes were routed, the usurpers that had broken away surrendered and their
provinces brought back under the rule of Rome. The short lived Empire of
Palmyra was defeated and Queen Zenobia was brought back as a captive to Rome
where wearing golden chains she rode in the Triumph accorded to Aurelian by
the Roman Senate.
In domestic affairs, Aurelian reformed the coinage and
established a new state religion that was monotheistic in character. The cult
of the unconquered son.
As is so true of the events of the third century, the story
ends in tragedy and death. It was the intention of Aurelian to wage war
against Persia in order to re-establish the province of Mesopotamia. Had he
been successful, think of how that would have changed history. Unfortunately,
he too was the victim of a plot hatched by his own secretary who had angered
him. He forged a list of officers who were to be purged by the emperor and in
their fear, struck first and killed him. When they discovered the deception
they executed the secretary and appealed to the Senate to appoint a new
emperor. Thus ended the career of one of the most competent rulers of a
troubled age.
The coin is a double Denarius or Antoninianus as they are
called. The reverse shows the figure of the SOL INVICTVS (the unconquered son)
standing over a Persian captive.

Click on images to see a larger version.